BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Suslov AV, Khasanova ZB, Buchaka AS, Doroschuk AD, Postnov AY. Herpesvirus infection and thoracic aortic aneurysm: Synthesis of evidence and contradictions. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 122814 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.122814]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The manuscript submission system may seem complicated at first glance. However, once you start working with it, everything becomes clear and logically structured. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, the editorial team was professional and responsive, and the final quality of the published article is excellent. I am very satisfied with the entire publication process and grateful for the opportunity to publish in World Journal of Cardiology.